Thursday, February 20, 2020

Talking on the phone while driving should be legal in Florida Essay

Talking on the phone while driving should be legal in Florida - Essay Example Talking on the phone while driving should be legal in Florida because drivers can talk through hands-free devices, driving does not require the use of speech, and it is not as bad as drunk driving. Drivers in Florida should be able to talk on the phone while behind the wheel of their car because it is possible to talk through hands-free devices. Technology has progressed to the point where a person can talk through a mobile phone without needing to hold it up to their face. I agree that letting drivers talk on a phone held up to their ear may be dangerous because drivers will not be focused on the road ahead of them. However, hands-free devices make it possible to have a conversation while driving a car. So long as the driver can focus on driving safely, then it should be no problem to talk with a hands-free device. Secondly, it should be legal for Florida drivers to talk on the phone and drive at the same time because driving does not require them to talk. It is very common for people to use more than one of the senses at the same time. While a person is driving, they can use their eyes to focus on the road and use their ears and mouth to communicate with the person at the other end of the line. These latter two senses are either not required at all or are very rarely used while driving so that drivers can use multiple senses at the same time. Finally, it is acceptable to allow drivers in Florida to talk on the phone while traveling because it is far safer than driving drunk. Drunk drivers do not have control of their senses and may act irrationally, whereas drivers who talk on the phone at the same time are able to maintain control because they are not intoxicated. Everyone knows that driving while drunk is dangerous, but talking on the phone is considerably safer. I believe that driving and talking on the phone should be legal in Florida for all the reasons listed above. So far there is

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Course Work Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Course Work - Essay Example The main objective of the IAS19 was to provide the accounting and disclosure for the benefits for employees. The benefits for employees refer to all kinds of considerations that are given to the employees by the company for the services that are rendered to the company. The main aim of this standard is to account for the expenses for the employee benefits in the period that it was earned rather than in the period when it is paid or payable. This allows the finances to be in place and to ensure that the expenses are recorded in the actual period rather than in any other payable period. IASB plays a major role in the development of the amendments for the IAS 19. There are a number of amendments that the IASB has brought into the IAS 19 and Sir David Tweedie, IASB Chairman had mentioned, ‘Pension costs are one of the most complex and obscure areas of accounting. The amendment issued today allows entities to choose a simpler, more transparent method of accounting than is commonly adopted at present. I hope that many entities will take the opportunity of improving their financial reporting in this way’ (International Accounting Standards Board, 2004). As mentioned earlier, the basic principle of IAS 19 is, ‘The cost of providing employee benefits should be recognised in the period in which the benefit is earned by the employee, rather than when it is paid or payable’ (Deolitte, 2010). Considering the standards there are a few differences that need to be considered and understood. These are as discussed below: a) Short term Benefits: There refer to the employee benefits that are required to be settled within the twelve months that the employee renders services. The benefits that classify under this heading include salaries, wages and other benefits like sick leave, bonuses and non monetary benefits as well. This does not require any actuarial valuation hence there is no need and